New subtleties are developing about the long, advantageous and now and again beset connection between the president and his devoted German bank.

For almost two decades, Donald J. Trump depended on Deutsche Bank to loan to him when different banks wouldn’t. Deutsche Bank, anxious to extend in the United States, settled on a choice to over and again go out on a limb on him.

Much has been expounded on their relationship, which is currently under scrutiny on Capitol Hill and by the New York lawyer general. Here are a portion of the new disclosures from The New York Times’ examination concerning Mr. Trump’s connections to Deutsche Bank.

Deutsche Bank cut off Mr. Trump twice — and after that continued loaning to him.

From the beginning, Deutsche Bank officials perceived that Mr. Trump was an unsafe customer — that is the reason most different banks thought about him forbidden. In any case, the bank before long got a very close perspective on its customer’s issues.

In 2003, Deutsche Bank helped Mr. Trump’s gambling club organization sell a huge number of dollars in bonds. (The sales reps were remunerated with an outing to Mar-a-Lago.) Mr. Trump’s organization defaulted in 2004, leaving Deutsche Bank’s customers with profound misfortunes. The bank’s venture division that sold the bonds promised to not work together again with Mr. Trump.

After a year, however, Mr. Trump moved toward another piece of the speculation division for a $640 million credit to assemble a high rise in Chicago. It made the advance — and in 2008, Mr. Trump defaulted and sued Deutsche Bank. That incited the entire speculation division to separate ties with Mr. Trump.

And afterward, three years after his past default, Deutsche Bank began loaning to him once more, this time through the private-banking division that obliged the superrich. Truth be told, it loaned Mr. Trump cash that he used to reimburse what despite everything he owed Deutsche Bank’s speculation division for the Chicago credit.

Top bank administrators upheld the relationship.

Since Mr. Trump won the 2016 decision, Deutsche Bank authorities have been attempting to limit the significance of their business with the new president, contending that some senior administrators didn’t realize the relationship existed.

Be that as it may, two of Deutsche Bank’s CEOs — just as various other senior officials — thought about and on occasion helped the relationship.

In late 2011, as the bank discussed whether to continue loaning to Mr. Trump after his 2008 defaults, a senior official asked Josef Ackermann, who was in his last a long time as CEO, about the potential credits. Mr. Ackermann offered a go-ahead, as indicated by individuals acquainted with the procedure. (Mr. Ackermann said in a meeting that he didn’t review being included.)

His successor, Anshu Jain, was informed on the Trump relationship right off the bat in his residency. In February 2013, Mr. Jain went with Rosemary T. Vrablic — Mr. Trump’s own investor at Deutsche Bank — to Trump Tower in Manhattan, as per two previous administrators. Over lunch, Mr. Jain commented to Mr. Trump that he was amazed by his generally low dimensions of obligation. Ms. Vrablic disclosed to her associates that Mr. Jain had sounded energetic about Mr. Trump’s accounts.

Deutsche Bank’s board discovered issues with its Trump loaning.

In 2016, the top managerial staff charged a report into how the bank had turned out to be so enmeshed with Mr. Trump.

The report, arranged by the board’s trustworthiness council, presumed that Deutsche’s private-banking division, which obliged rich people, was so resolved to win business from enormous name customers that its administrators had looked past Mr. Trump’s history of stiffing his banks and for participating in demagogy, as per an individual who read the report.

The audit likewise discovered that Deutsche Bank had created various “presentation reports” that hailed the developing business with Mr. Trump, yet that they had not been sufficiently investigated by senior administrators.

Board individuals found that the Trump relationship was a side effect of a more extensive issue with the bank’s siloed the executives structure and a culture of completing arrangements no matter what.

Mr. Trump made them premium financiers.

Mr. Trump’s first go-to person at Deutsche Bank was Mike Offit, who masterminded advances to redesign 40 Wall Street and to manufacture a pinnacle inverse the United Nations. He and Mr. Trump developed agreeable, playing golf and going to bouts together. Mr. Trump even wrote in a June 1998 letter to Mr. Offit’s dad saying, “you have an incredible child!”

In 1999, a senior Deutsche Bank official found that a credit officer’s mark on a Trump advance record had been fashioned. Mr. Offit was never blamed for fraud and the advance did not experience. He was later terminated.

Next, another broker, Justin Kennedy, ventured up to help lead the bank’s business land gathering. Mr. Kennedy was the child of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who once in a while visited Deutsche Bank’s workplaces. The more youthful Kennedy built up an association with Mr. Trump and helped him obtain cash from Deutsche Bank, including on the decisive Chicago venture.

At long last, there was Ms. Vrablic. Deutsche Bank enlisted her to its private-banking division in 2006. One of her current customers was Jared Kushner, who later acquainted her with his dad in-law, Mr. Trump, as indicated by an individual acquainted with the relationship.

Ms. Vrablic, a seriously private individual who seldom talked about close to home issues with her associates, directed more than $300 million in credits to Mr. Trump over the resulting years. When he was confirmed as president, Ms. Vrablic sat in the V.I.P. segment of the group of onlookers.

She hopes to be called to affirm before Congress.